Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 2:00:35 GMT -5
Carta. Furthermore, it cannot be forgotten that the employee's inclusion in the work environment does not take away her personality rights, of which the right to privacy constitutes a species. Therefore, there is no doubt that the use of the polygraph by the appellant appears to be illegal and by allowing this logic of the aviation market, that is, this mistaken management policy, we would be reducing the importance of Brazilian Labor Law and the normative force of its principles, restricting the worker to the condition of an object. The employer must exercise his directive power, and this exercise never authorizes him to direct the employee's life. Once the illegal act committed by the defendant.
was established, to meet the requirements of the airline "American Airlines", the order to pay compensation for moral damages is the necessary measure. REPORT The complainant initially sought compensation for Phone Number List moral damages. The defendant gathered defense and documents. Manifestation by the author. Hearing of parties and witnesses. Closing of the procedural instruction. The r. sentence of fls. 102/105 upheld the complaint. Motions for clarification were filed by the defendant on page 109/112 and rejected on page 130/131, with fines imposed. The complainant appeals to pages 113/121 against the arbitrated amount of compensation. The defendant files an ordinary appeal.
on page 136/144, arguing, in preliminary, the contradiction of the complainant's witness and arguing against the recognition of moral damage. Prepare on page 150/152. Counter-reasons by the defendant on page 156/164 and by the complainant on page 165/169. The Public Ministry of Labor reviewed the case. It's the report. VOTE 1. I know the ordinary resources of the complainant and the defendant, as the legal requirements are present. Firstly, I appreciate the defendant's appeal, as it contains a preliminary nullity. 2. Appeal by the defendant (page 136): 2.1. From the preliminary statement of the complainant's witness: The appellant's non-compliance is not valid.
was established, to meet the requirements of the airline "American Airlines", the order to pay compensation for moral damages is the necessary measure. REPORT The complainant initially sought compensation for Phone Number List moral damages. The defendant gathered defense and documents. Manifestation by the author. Hearing of parties and witnesses. Closing of the procedural instruction. The r. sentence of fls. 102/105 upheld the complaint. Motions for clarification were filed by the defendant on page 109/112 and rejected on page 130/131, with fines imposed. The complainant appeals to pages 113/121 against the arbitrated amount of compensation. The defendant files an ordinary appeal.
on page 136/144, arguing, in preliminary, the contradiction of the complainant's witness and arguing against the recognition of moral damage. Prepare on page 150/152. Counter-reasons by the defendant on page 156/164 and by the complainant on page 165/169. The Public Ministry of Labor reviewed the case. It's the report. VOTE 1. I know the ordinary resources of the complainant and the defendant, as the legal requirements are present. Firstly, I appreciate the defendant's appeal, as it contains a preliminary nullity. 2. Appeal by the defendant (page 136): 2.1. From the preliminary statement of the complainant's witness: The appellant's non-compliance is not valid.